The new questionnaire consisted of step 3 parts. Area We included issues out-of socio-market investigation (many years, amount of studies, parity, familial income, occupation, latest marital position, sexual activity, history of HPV vaccination, and you will history of unpredictable cervical cancer examination).
Part II made up of 6 questions relating to the target women that shall be processed, many years to begin with, frequency, years otherwise conditions to avoid out-of screening, and techniques out of evaluating. Just the users that has ever heard out-of HPV would go ahead so you’re able to Area III and therefore analyzed understanding of HPV regarding their particular (oncogenic otherwise non-oncogenic), form out of transmission and prevention.
Ahead of the data, the new questionnaire away from part II and part III in the Thai variation was contemplated, discussed, and you will modified up to opinion one of 20 researchers have been all the gynecologic oncologists (specific were experts in other parallel studies). The experts ranked each one of 19 questions as often ‘relevant’ otherwise ‘maybe not relevant’. The item-height Blogs Authenticity List (I-CVI) is actually determined for every single goods, as well as the Content Validity List (CVI) try calculated by firmly taking an average proportion away from fourteen questions regarding information about cervical cancers testing and 5 questions regarding HPV. The fresh CVI was indeed step one for elements of the newest questionnaire (S1 Desk). Brand new precision is examined in the 30 feminine with the exact same trait since the participants. The latest Cronbach’ leader coefficients on precision was in fact 0.819 for information about cervical disease assessment and you may 0.907 to own understanding of HPV.
Towards the big date off planned colposcopy, the study assistant provided pointers of analysis into women just who found inclusion requirements. The ladies who offered to participate offered written informed consent and you may getbride.org Hjemmeside replied the survey on their own on their own just before continuing to help you colposcopy.
Studies collected for this data was socio-market studies (Region We of your own questionnaire), expertise in cervical cancer tumors evaluating (Region II), and you will experience with HPV (Area III).
The brand new answers of real information from the cervical cancer evaluating and HPV was in fact reviewed from the each product in advance of scoring categorization. Proper address was scored since the step one whereas ‘wrong and being unsure of answer’ is obtained 0.
Off fourteen inquiries from cervical cancer examination, women whose rating have been ? ten was indeed arbitrarily categorized given that that have ‘good knowledge’ otherwise was in fact considered as having “unhealthy studies”. For expertise in HPV, women whoever address is actually ‘never been aware of HPV’ have been excluded from the research from HPV studies.
Of 5 concerns, women whose get was in fact ? step 3 was basically thought to be which have ‘good expertise in HPV’ or else since ‘unhealthy knowledge’. Off 19 inquiries, women whoever rating was basically ? thirteen were categorized as the having ‘an excellent complete knowledge’ usually given that ‘negative full knowledge’.
All research were amassed in the a digital database and reviewed having fun with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Detailed analytics were used to analyze group studies and you will have been summarized given that quantity having commission, mean that have important departure or median that have assortment. The brand new association anywhere between for every adjustable and you may degree get had been assessed playing with effortless linear regression. Exploratory design is made when you look at the multivariable studies and additionally all the details potentially associated with the knowledge get. The experienced number of analytical importance is actually an excellent p-worth of 0.05 otherwise quicker.
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged < 40>